Good seems quite strong for the lens you've pictured. Good is as good does,
however. The pitfall of all the subjective terminology used in 'that
place'.
You've dialogued with the seller? If so, to what end?
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Savage [mailto:zuiko@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 9:53 AM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Catholic guilt
I just submitted my very first dispute to those pally payers. Now, in
the spirit of all left-footers I'm wondering whether I've been a little
harsh.
How would you feel buying a lens described as 'good condition' and
receiving this:
http://www.savvo.co.uk/14pb200766.jpg
http://www.savvo.co.uk/14pb240909.jpg
On top of which it's a different serial number (albeit higher) than the
one pictured in the auction.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
