I would like to qualify that the statement "quality rather than
throughput" refers only to me and my wife being amateurs and that for
other members on the list professional and amateurs could manage to do both
thanks Ian
swisspace wrote:
> Okay, thanks that explains why there is not so much information on it as
> it was a silly idea :-) .
>
> has anyone else found a big difference when scanning kodachrome 64 and
> 200 my canon 2700F just cannot handle 200. I cannot however justify
> another scanner to my wife (hence the digital body approach), who wants
> to learn to do prints from slides anyway (which suits me) so we want to
> set up a darkroom. It is just a hobby so quality rather than throughput
> is the driver.
>
> I did some BW developing years ago, but other activities got in the way
> and I haven't done any for a while. I have never done any colour
> developing as I was frightened away from it, Is it really that difficult
> to make prints from slides and any recommendations on which enlarger etc
> to buy. Or can you point me to some decent online tutorials or reading
> fodder.
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|