| Subject: | [OM] Re: slightly OT - UK - film scanning - business proposition? |
|---|---|
| From: | Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 18 Sep 2004 21:14:38 -0700 |
You may be right about that, but I am not sure how they develop prints if they are waterproof. Winsor Long Beach, CA USA On Sep 18, 2004, at 10:14 AM, Simon Worby wrote: > 1. The ink wouldn't be waterproof (professionally-printed photos are). ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Digital Dilemma - 50/2 on E-1, bokeh also, Winsor Crosby |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: What's missing?, Winsor Crosby |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: slightly OT - UK - film scanning - business proposition?, Piers Hemy |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: slightly OT - UK - film scanning - business proposition?, Simon Worby |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |