If you are talking about the blooming of the incandescent lamp, I have
already mentioned in another email, it is the details of the lamp housing
which only appear as a dot on the digital. If not for Moose mentioned about
that I didn't notice there is so much details on the film image! May be it
is time to go back to use more slides :-)
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Wayne S" <om4t@xxxxxxxx>
>
> To me the neon sign is not related to spectral sensitivity of digital
> versus film, but simply better resolution in the film shot. The film
> does exhibit some blooming, but my experience with the LS-4000 scanner
> is that the scanner may be the culprit. Only CH can look at the slide
> and tell us for a fact. I had an underexposed RHP (Provia 100) shot of
> a horse with white stripe on the nose. The film showed no blooming, but
> the Nikon scan of the slide did. Again, the film disadvantage is the
> intermediate step of scanning, which introduces its own problems.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|