| Subject: | [OM] Re: "top-posting"? was excessive quoting |
|---|---|
| From: | Andrew L Wendelborn <andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 4 Sep 2004 20:49:23 +0930 |
At 12:12 PM +0100 2004.09.04, Piers Hemy wrote: >This is top-posted, Chris > >Piers > And this is bottom-posting with sensible editing :) :) Easily achieved by scrolling through the message being replied to, deleting unneeded bits and inserting suitable insighful new comments ... Andrew ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: "top-posting"? was excessive quoting, Piers Hemy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: "top-posting"? was excessive quoting, Andrew Fildes |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: "top-posting"? was excessive quoting, Piers Hemy |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: "top-posting"? was excessive quoting, Andrew Fildes |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |