At 12:14 PM 7/7/2004, Magda wrote:
>[Parenthetically, whoever that is in the shot, she's going to get you
>for putting that picture on the web :) ]
At 02:30 PM 7/7/2004, Steve wrote:
>On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 08:04:38 -0400, W Shumaker <om4t@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Wow - you needed the 135 macro? Just how tiny is she? :-)
The image will be short lived on the web. I realized that the spider
was not going to show up, so I aimed the camera at the next best
subject. That is what I like about the 135 macro, good working
distance, and infinity focus, so she is not too tiny. She would
probably enjoy knowing the picture is out there. She is quite the ham
for the camera. Although these have nothing to do with the OM adapter,
I took the shots the same day. Just to balance out the previous post.
http://www.zuik.net/E1/5050_P7070575.jpg
http://www.zuik.net/E1/5050_P7070573.jpg
She is quite the swimmer. I hope to teach her some scuba skills, as she
is quite good with that snorkel.
/wayne
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
