Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Tamron - what IS OT then?

Subject: [OM] Re: Tamron - what IS OT then?
From: "Gordon J. Ross" <gordross@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2004 09:14:55 -0600
Hi Andrew:

Just like Mr Bobbit if they used a frankfurter for a missing piece it would
be OM as in Oscar Meyer (hot dogs) so theres the logic. Have a great
day --its nice to be back in temperate Calgary but Texas was a great time!

Gord



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Andrew Fildes" <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, June 05, 2004 2:20 AM
Subject: [OM] Re: Tamron - what IS OT then?


>
> OK Tamron buddies - today I got a 135mm f2.5 Tammie which is supposed
> to be a goodie - certainly had that focus 'snap' on an OM40 they had
> lying around.
> Now if I put it on my 10D using an OL Adaptall and the Kindai adapter,
> does that count as OM on the grounds that I used an OM mounting
> protocol or would I have to use an Oly filter and/or an 2XA converter
> to make it kosher?
> AndrewF :)
> http://www.pbase.com/afildes
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz