| Subject: | [OM] Re: Battery Question |
|---|---|
| From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 01 May 2004 22:42:58 -0700 |
Nice to see your voice again. :-) Moose jlind@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >The SR44W is essentially a #357 watch cell and can withstand short duration >high drain demands better compared to the SR44 and its kin (MS76, etc.). > >-- John Lind > The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List Problem" |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Okay, let's talk about film ........, Scott Gomez |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: was...jonequinn... now: cost of OM-4T when new..., ClassicVW |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Battery Question, John A. Lind |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Battery Question, John A. Lind |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |