Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Scan sizes, was Unbelievable Conversion on OM 2S

Subject: [OM] Re: Scan sizes, was Unbelievable Conversion on OM 2S
From: Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 18:45:47 +0100
Moose

When you use this format, you have the choice of qualities or 
'lossless'.  I should have expected that to fulfill its description.  
Are you telling me that this dialogue box is an out and out liar? ;-)

Chris

On 1 Apr 2004 , at 8:15, Moose wrote:

>
> JPEG2000  is not lossless, just better than regular JPEG.
>
> Moose
>
> hiwayman@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
>> Chris,
>>
>> Apologies for the belated response.  My e-mail pitched a fit late 
>> yesterday and all I was getting was "That page is not available" 
>> until this morning.
>>
>> I'll give the JPEG2000 a try.  Or get a DVD burner. :-)
>>
>>
>
>
> The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>
> To contact the list admins: 
> mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List Problem"
>       
>
>
<|_:-)_|>

C M I Barker
Cambridgeshire, Great Britain.

+44 (0)7092 251126
ftog at threeshoes.co.uk
http://www.threeshoes.co.uk
http://homepage.mac.com/zuiko
... a nascent photo library.


The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe

To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus 
List Problem"
        

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz