I am surprised. I thought that I had read that loss or no loss was
dependent on the amount of compression with JPEG2000. I think that it
has a rather steep licensing fee though which may prevent it from
becoming a standard.
Winsor
Long Beach, California
USA
On Mar 31, 2004, at 11:15 PM, Moose wrote:
> JPEG2000 is not lossless, just better than regular JPEG.
>
> Moose
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|