You forgot Mamiya, Pentax K, Konica, others?
>
>Subject: [OM] Re: Why E1 over others?
> From: "Piers Hemy" <piers@xxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 11:29:17 +0100
> To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>Well now, isn't that precisely what Olympus did when introducing the OM
>bayonet? A completely new mount, incompatible with any previous Olympus SLR,
>as with any other manufacturer's mount at the time. Cutting out
>compatibility with Pentax screw, Canon FD, Minolta and Nikon bayonet,
>Exakta/Topcon, Rollei, Leica, Contax ... need I go on (I am having
>difficulty remembering them all)?
>
>Piers
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
>Of CyberSimian
>Sent: 30 March 2004 12:01
>To: Olympus Mailing List
>Subject: [OM] Re: Why E1 over others?
>
>
>--snip
>
>What the other systems have that the E system lacks is a lens mount that is
>common with their film SLRs.
>
>--snip
>
>
>The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
>To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>
>To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
>List Problem"
>
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|