| Subject: | [OM] Re: Tamron 80-200 f 2.8 |
|---|---|
| From: | Larry <halpert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 01 Mar 2004 14:47:20 -0500 |
Ultimately, really the same image quality, but lighter, better tripod mount, and less famous so its less expensive. Larry NSURIT@xxxxxxx wrote: > > > > With all the praise being sung of this lens, > > how do you people rate the similar Tokina 80-200 f2.8 ? The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List Problem" |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Sensor Failure, was OM1n/ 2n/ spot, Winsor Crosby |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: series 1 19-35/3.5-4.5, Piers Hemy |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Tamron 80-200 f 2.8, NSURIT |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Tamron 80-200 f 2.8, Skip Williams |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |