>I think the driving force behind most pro movement to digital is reduced
>cost and saving time and effort in the post shooting workflow.
I think most pros will tell you that digital may save on film and processing
(although that is offset by increased computing requirements), but workflow is
intensified. With film, I send it to the lab. They process it, and print or
scan it or both. They get things color and density corrected. With digital,
it's all on me. I may save on direct costs, but labor goes wild. For
photojournalism, that's ok, because they need it fast, and the printing process
they work under is, errrr, forgiving.
And that's not including time spent cleaning sensors.
Bill Pearce
__________________________________________________________________
Introducing the New Netscape Internet Service.
Only $9.95 a month -- Sign up today at http://isp.netscape.com/register
Netscape. Just the Net You Need.
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|