On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 22:41:32 -0000, Donald MacDonald
<d1956m198d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Nice and contrasty, built like a tank, good performer stopped down.
Probably
worse at the wide end.
worse in what sense? is there a compelling reason to get the constant
aperture vs the 3.5-4.5 one?
--
/S
aim:iddibhai
icq:104079359
msidd004atstudentdotucrdotedu
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|