I like the 3.5-4.5 better, because it is smaller. Both are fine lenses.
Neither matches the 35-80/2.8 or even the 35-70/3.6 in quality or weight.
Tom
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 22:41:32 -0000, Donald MacDonald
> <d1956m198d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> > Nice and contrasty, built like a tank, good performer stopped down.
> > Probably
> > worse at the wide end.
>
> worse in what sense? is there a compelling reason to get the constant
> aperture vs the 3.5-4.5 one?
>
> --
> /S
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|