| Subject: | Re: [OM] New E-1 |
|---|---|
| From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 23 Sep 2003 17:08:07 -0700 |
Richard F. Man wrote: Thank you Chuck and thank you BD for bravely poking things down at the brand-new-us-mortal-can-only-drool-over E-1 in the name of science. I have narrowed down my choices to 3: 1 - P*ntax D*ist because it is small I was interested in it for its size too, until I looked more carefully. My reading is that its stop down metering capability with MF lenses is much less useable than the Can*n. Also be sure that flange to film distance will allow a lensless converter, as Can*n does. Less cost, less image degradation. Moose < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] New E-1, Jim Brokaw |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] OM 2000 Flash Fill In, Titoy |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] New E-1, Jim Brokaw |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] New E-1, Timpe, Jim |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |