Siddiq wrote
> On Fri, 22 Aug 2003 22:51:11 -0400, Lama-Jim L'Hommedieu <lamadoo@xxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> i dunno where you chaps are getting oversharpened film scans, but the fuji
> frontier 390 (latest) machine i get scans onto cd from seems to do a good
> job--unless i am missing the severe sharpening artifact.
>
> linked below a fullsize, untouched, raw scan from CD. 1600*1200 pixels, a
> smidgen under 3Mb large, so either patience or broadband is required. film was
> fuji npz (800 speed). 200/4 zuik wide open @ 1/60sec , T32 full dump, approx
> 70ft range.
I can't see any sharpening artifacts in that image, but I also note it doesn't
take any additional sharpening at all well. Is that due to it being from 800
asa
film?
Brian
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|