----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard F. Man" <richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, 23 July, 2003 12:29 AM
Subject: RE: [OM] Apple to Orange comparison
> At 10:30 AM 7/23/2003 +0800, C.H.Ling-Accura wrote:
> >Richard, you got some much better picts then the other Leica guy! his
tree
> >just look pale.
>
> *blush* Thanks! I know I got a good one when my daughter, upon seeing the
> dye sub print, asked if she can have it. This is the first and only time
> she has done so!!
>
> >For the first guess from the framing and out of focus background, I
thought
> >IMG19 is from 90/2 and IMG31 is from 35/1.4. But... I think there must be
> >some trick as you post this question. OK, I bet IMG36 is from 35/1.4 and
the
> >other is from 90/2 :-)
>
> No trick, it is so obvious that I have to ask :-) img19 and img36 are OM
> 90/2 and img31 is M7.
The top and the top left part of the sky in img31 is slightly darker than
the rest of the sky. Is this the result of having used a polarizing filter?
If so what was your technique for measuring the degree of darkening
required?
jh
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|