Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Which OM is best for astrophotography

Subject: Re: [OM] Which OM is best for astrophotography
From: Fernando Gonzalez Gentile <fgnzalez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 17:02:41 -0300
on 16/07/2003 02:39, Moose at olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> That's why your OM-2 doesn't eat batteries on your long
> exposures, 'B' is mechanical and works fine without batteries in the
> camera at all.
No, I rarely use B on my longexposures. I like to play with the 2 low light
metering design and in such a way I discovered that it simply does not eat
batteries. Maybe my long exposures were almost always with short lenses with
small and lightweight diaphragms. This is just my experience.
And there IS a difference between plain 2 and 2N on this matter, stated at
esif. That´s why I overexpose +2 (=ASA25)

Rgds

Fernando


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz