>You get medium format AND
>sync to the minimum shutter speed for a song.
>Hope you find what you need!
>-Mickey
What song would that be? Every time I talk to them- They want money, not a
song and dance! };^)>
yours I did it my way,
Garry
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mickey Trageser" <vze3m2s8@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2003 10:42 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] Anybody shoot at F22?
> Albert,
> The sync speed comment came out of the blue! Generally speaking, I have
the
> impression that you like the OM system, but really don't want to embrace
it
> as your 'system' to use. That's fine. You are drawn to the MF rangefinder.
> You also desire features that the OM system doesn't offer. I think that if
> you poll the membership, you would find that nearly everyone has cameras
> outside the OM system to handle various tasks, whether they be point and
> shoot needs, digital or studio work. OM covers a wide breadth of
> capabilities, but no system does it all. Choose the tools you need to
handle
> the tasks at hand. Results are what matters. Not the nameplate on the
gear.
> Get what you need.
>
> If there is a way to achieve what you want with OM gear, you've found the
> right place to ask. You may also find answers that lead you to other
branded
> gear.
>
> You will not find a genuine OM system camera with normal flash sync over
> 1/60. The F280 with a 4T body will sync very high in super FP mode. This
is
> a special relationship between that flash and that body. It may serve
your
> needs. If you need 1/250 sync with a normal flash unit, run down to the
> camera store and they will have something to sell you new. You can also do
> this with old MF equipment. Get a Mamiya C220. You get medium format AND
> sync to the minimum shutter speed for a song.
>
> Hope you find what you need!
> -Mickey
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Albert" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2003 11:09 AM
> Subject: Re: [OM] Anybody shoot at F22?
>
>
>
> > >
> > I know that most at F8 or F5.6 will be the sharpest, F16 is a drop in
> > quality, and F22 probably even more so. Also, I know an ND is a better
> > choice, but as I don't have one, A PL will have to do, also, it did cut
> > the water reflections quite a bit, and so I was happy about that..
> >
> > I really wish the sync speed is faster too..
> >
> > Albert
> >
> >
> >
> > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|