Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Photoshop much better than iview, proof!

Subject: Re: [OM] Photoshop much better than iview, proof!
From: "C.H.Ling" <chling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 21:28:19 +0800
Ok, I understand your problem now, I never use such high compression so I
don't seen any problem (I usually use level 9 in photoshop 6 and >95% with
IV). I have made a test with a 10D file, the result is below:

Resample the file from 3072x2048 to 460x307:

IV 3.8 resample, photoshop 6.0 LZW compressed
http://www.accura.com.hk/TEST_IV.tif

Photoshop 6.0 resample and LZW compressed
http://www.accura.com.hk/TEST_PS.tif

Hard to see any different at 300% view.

IV 3.8 JPEG - Compression level 94, file size 69K
http://www.accura.com.hk/TEST_IV.jpg

Photoshop 6.0 compression level 8, file size 68K
http://www.accura.com.hk/TEST_PS.jpg

At 300% view IV is better to my eyes. I think your may try slightly
different compression level, different software may perform differently at
different setting. Anyway I think the different is small and your
compression level used was too high.

C.H.Ling

----- Original Message -----
From: "Albert" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 5:48 PM
Subject: [OM] Photoshop much better than iview, proof!


> http://albert.achtung.com/irfanview/
>
> Just to PROVE what a nerd I am..  I just put up a page comparing the
> images compressed from both..
>
> A picture is worth a thousand words..
>
> Albert


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz