I'd say the 2S is no more or less reliable than a 4.
_________________________________
John Hermanson www.zuiko.com
Camtech, Olympus Sales & Service since 1977
21 South Lane, Huntington NY 11743-4714
631-424-2121 For Free Olympus manuals,
please call 1-800-221-3000
_________________________________
----- Original Message -----
From: <lamadoo@xxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 8:54 AM
Subject: [OM] OM2S- more reliable than OM4?
> The other day, someone was saying that the OM-4 and OM-PC can act up
(electrically) for no apparent reason. Those are the two bodies I own
because I need to be able to meter with 1600 film and dial in underexposure
compensation.
>
> Are you guys saying that the OM-2S is more reliable than the 4? I'm
working towards fewer bodies so, would the 2S be a more reliable body to
standardize on than the 4?
>
> My memory of it was that the 2S, 4, and PC are similar under the shells.
If all of the boards are of the same vintage, does anyone have an idea about
what makes the 2S more reliable than the 4 and PC?
>
> Lama,
> former owner of these: OM-1 (pre-n), OM-2n.
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|