| Subject: | Re: [OM] Standard lens? |
|---|---|
| From: | "Lama-Jim L'Hommedieu" <lamadoo@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 31 Mar 2003 14:19:01 -0500 |
Just one more thing: The difference between 1.8 and 1.4 is less than 1 whole stop. The difference between 1.4 and 1.2 is also less than one whole stop. The whole steps are, of course: 2.8>2>1.4>1.0 From: "R. Jackson" <jackson.robert.r@xxxxxxxxx> About the only time I find myself > putting the 50 on is when I'm out of light and can't use a flash. I was > just trying to decide if it was worth the money to grab a 1.2 or a 1.4 > for that kind of low-light stuff. < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Re: Standard lens?, Per Ohstrom |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] A little on-topic spam :) going OT, Lars Haven |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Standard lens?, Dorothée Rapp |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Standard lens?, Andrew Dacey |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |