Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [OM] Portrait work: Reala or NPS 160??

Subject: RE: [OM] Portrait work: Reala or NPS 160??
From: "Walt Wayman" <hiwayman@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 10:08:59 -0500
I shoot mostly slides, probably 85-90%, but NPS is my standard, 
all-purpose print film.  I like it because of what I consider to 
be its accuracy.  I just don't care for the exaggerated colors and 
comic paper look of a lot of other negative emulsions.  Too much 
stuff looks like a scene from the movie "Dick Tracy."

Walt

---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "Dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date:  Mon, 10 Feb 2003 08:39:17 -0600

>I haven't had a lot of luck with Reala when it's underexposed     
>(what I think Joel is saying below).  Grain zooms up, highlights 
>shift green, etc.
>
>HAVE used both Portra and NPS a lot, and have landed firmly in 
>the NPS camp.  Great skin tones, and slightly more "punch" than 
>Portra.
>
>Dave
>
 


 
                   

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz