Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Portrait work: Reala or NPS 160??

Subject: Re: [OM] Portrait work: Reala or NPS 160??
From: "John A. Lind" <jlind@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 06:41:38 -0500
At 08:52 2/9/03, you wrote:
At 07:10 AM 2/9/2003 -0500, John you wrote:
Albert,
For traditional [formal] portraiture, Kodak Portra NC or Fuji NPS is the failsafe stuff to use. Reala is really good stuff, but it's more general purpose with higher saturation and slightly higher contrast.

As always, exactly what you choose to use depends on what you want for results; it's a tradeoff. Go with the Reala *if* there is strong reason for higher saturation and a little more contrast. Go with the pro portrait films (e.g., Portra or NPS) if finer tonal gradation and accuracy with the skin tones are more important than higher saturation and contrast.

I am starting to like Portra 160NC for general photography. It's like Kodachrome in a print film. The grain at ASA 160 seems better than most ASA 100 print films. Anyone else have this experience?

Joel W.

Yes with regard to the grain. It is, indeed, much finer grained than the low end consumer ISO 100 films . . . and holds its own well compared to the pro general purpose ISO 100 stuff (e.g. Supra).

Color accuracy is similar to Kodachrome . . . but my experience is Kodachrome has much narrower latitude, slightly less than the E-6 stuff I've tried . . . and as a result it's significantly contrastier than Portra which has a latitude one can parallel park a semi in. I don't worry about white wedding dresses next to black tuxes with Portra and that would be a nightmare with Kodachrome. If you can get subjects into lower contrast clothing and illuminate them with very soft and very low contrast lighting Kodachrome can be used for portraiture . . . but it's still tricky and very unforgiving of any exposure error and nearly as unforgiving of any light temperature other than solid daylight. Even so, direct printed on Ilfochrome a good Kodachrome portrait can create a stunning image. Portra is so much more forgiving on all counts that I worry much less about contrast, light temperature and exposure error when using it.

BTW, I've used Agfa Scala 200X in studio for B/W portraits and had them printed on Ilfochrome. Much different compared to traditional B/W negative on silver-gelatin prints and equally as stunning as doing a Kodachrome on Ilfochrome. It does require a lab with some experience in printing Scala to keep the print a neutral gray.

-- John


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz