Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [OM] Portrait work: Reala or NPS 160??

Subject: RE: [OM] Portrait work: Reala or NPS 160??
From: Scott Gomez <scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 08:45:42 -0800
Because of this thread, I was just reviewing some Reala shots this morning.
That's a good description of the problems I've also seen with Reala, Dave.
Very unforgiving of any underexposure and that green shift is really
annoying. I also like the NPS.

---
Scott Gomez

-----Original Message-----
From: Dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Subject: RE: [OM] Portrait work: Reala or NPS 160??

I haven't had a lot of luck with Reala when it's underexposed (what I think
Joel is saying below).  Grain zooms up, highlights shift green, etc.

HAVE used both Portra and NPS a lot, and have landed firmly in the NPS camp.
Great skin tones, and slightly more "punch" than Portra.

Dave

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz