I don't think it would be redundant, as the Tamron is a macro. However,
coupled with your other msg re 100/2 Zuiko, my suggestion would be sell both
100s (the 100/2 is a much sought after lens and should bring a good price).
Then take the $$$s and buy a Zuiko 90/2 macro. It outperforms the Tamron
and is a stop faster. You may even find the 50/3.5 is then redundant and
could sell that too.
George
> I currently own the Olympus 100/2.8, but I've been looking at the Tamron
> 90/2.5 for standard shooting and macro work. It seems like a good way to
> have two lenses in one. Does anyone on the list have actual
> experience with
> the lens as a standard lens? I would imagine it would be quite
> similar to
> the Olympus 100/2.8 in performance, but I have no way to measure.
>
> I'm quite interested in acquiring one, but maybe it's redundant with a
> 100/2.8? (And I have the 50/3.5 Olympus Macro.)
> James.
>
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> The new MSN 8 is here: Try it free* for 2 months
> http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|