Richardand John,
I had been seeing that lens sitting there with $5,000 BIN since it
started, I was surprised to see anyone bid. It must be a collector
thing. It was only after I posted my original email, that I took a
closer look at the pictures to see it was "only" a 1.2. :-) I knew the
original discussion was of the "fast" 1.0 one.
John
"Richard F. Man" wrote:
>
> At 12:11 PM 12/11/2002 -0500, you wrote:
> >My fellow Zuikoholics
> > After seeing this auction, I have no doubt the Zuiko is better.
> >Afterall, if you can not afford to buy the camera after you buy the
> >lens, all you have is a tube with some glass in it.
> >John
> >The auction:
> ><http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1944808739&category=30063>
> >
>
> Not that I can afford it, but a new F1.0 Noctilux is "only" $2600 from B&H.
> Why pay more for a slow lens :-)
>
> // richard <http://www.imagecraft.com>
> <http://www.dragonsgate.net/mailman/listinfo>
> On-line orders, support, and listservers available on web site.
> [ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all previous
> replies in your msgs. ]
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|