| Subject: | [OM] 50mm f2 vs 3.5 |
|---|---|
| From: | Albert <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 18 Nov 2002 00:40:51 +0800 |
I lust after the 50mm f2, but was wondering, does it's cheaper f3.5
brother give as sharp of an image?
I've read about the f2, it's legendary, but I don't know much about the 3.5. Someone enlighten me. Albert < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] sharpness of the 50/2, Tim Chakravorty |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Do not read..test of AOL 8 mail, Tom Scales |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Do not read..test of AOL 8 mail, GMcGrath |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 50mm f2 vs 3.5, Winsor Crosby |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |