| Subject: | Re: [OM] OM-2's -- who needs 'em? |
|---|---|
| From: | DaEyeGuy@xxxxxxx |
| Date: | Sun, 13 Oct 2002 16:40:19 EDT |
In a message dated 10/13/2002 3:21:35 PM Eastern Daylight Time, jbrokaw@xxxxxxxxxxx writes: > IMO the OM-2n was about the pinnacle of > classic OM design. Amen...I'll second that notion!!! Susan Steele Amherst, VA |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] OM-2's -- who needs 'em?, Wayne Culberson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] A tragedy has happened here, Walt Wayman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM-2's -- who needs 'em?, DaEyeGuy |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM-2's -- who needs 'em?, Carlos J. Santisteban Salinas |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |