Re: [OM] OM-4Ti(65-200 zoom)

[C.H.Ling]

Nik*n has no 65-200, I think you refer to this talk about the
80-200/2.8ED... Oh! Tim was talking about the ED not the AFS... I
heard the AFS is much better. 

C.H.Ling

Andre Goforth wrote:
> 
> Tim,
> 
> In one of the posts you mentioned a 65-200 zoom. That
> was for a Nikon right? Have you tried the Oly 65-200?
> I've got one and have taken a fair number of pics with
> it. Haven't really stressed tested the results with
> blowups. I find it a bit moosey; I feel like someone
> is sitting on the end of the barrel all the time. My
> favorite(but not ideal) combo is the 35-105 and the
> 200 f4(I'd like to get an f5 200--I hear it is a best
> kept secret) The 200 f4 oly is quite something in my
> book.
> 
> Andre

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >