Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Which film scanner

Subject: Re: [OM] Which film scanner
From: "Tim Chakravorty" <suchismit@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 00:01:59 -0700
I said *almost* non existent, meaning I find it to be below perceptible levels. 
Can you post 
scans of your slides that you thought were noisy (with single pass)?

-Tim



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "C.H.Ling" <chling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 8:39 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] Which film scanner


> Noise non exist on LS40? Interesting to know the LS40 is better than
> LS4000, I have seen a test report said you need 4x on the LS4000 to
> get the best noise level (for slides of course). I'm still using 4x
> for some important slides on my LS4000, I think I need to check it out
> how the actual noise level is.
> 
> C.H.Ling
> 
> Tim Chakravorty wrote:
> > 
> > The LS 40 is  the best value for the money. Its better than the LS 2000 in 
> > almost every respect
> > (higher DPI , ED glass lens, better ICE..etc) In fact the only thing it 
> > cannot do is  batch scan for which
> > Nikon wants you to get  the upper model (LS4000 ). Multiscan is not 
> > required like in the LS2000, as
> > shadow noise is almost non existent ! And of course, its also 100s less. In 
> > short the LS40 is the best
> > scanner on the market for < $1000.
> > 
> > -Tim
> >
> 
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
> 


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz