| Subject: | [OM] 28 vs 35 |
|---|---|
| From: | "Bill Pearce" <bspearce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 30 Jul 2002 08:39:24 -0500 |
"So, the short answer is both? ;)" You should know, I don't have short answers! Bill Pearce < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] OM-1N and 625A battery, John Hermanson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] ...... 28/2 or 35/2?....., TMLee |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 28 vs 35, ll . clark |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] [Fwd: Fwd: No more JPEGs?], Ed Senior |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |