Greetings All,
Please forgive me for digressing from discussions of OM, but I would like
to describe a recent series of events that I think speaks volumes about the
state of digital photography.
Let me begin by stating up front that I see its good points..most
significant being quick turn around time. It was for this reason we decided
to purchase a Nikon Coolpix 950 to use in our Pathology practice. It is used
mainly in the weekly Cancer Conference in which newly diagnosed cancer cases
are presented for discussion before a group of surgeons, oncologists, etc to
discuss treatment options. Typically we get the patient names the afternoon
before or the morning of the conference, so digital is a god-send for
quickly obtaining images for presentation (in the old days we used polaroid
slide film that we developed on site...don't want to go back there).
Last Monday the Coolpix died (for the second time). I called around town
to find a rental...no luck. I called around to different departments in the
hospital and located 5 other digital cameras. Two were unsuitable for use
with a microscope and the other three were BROKEN. All were less than two
years old. Now I know these things are complicated but is their reliability
really that much less than a typical film wunderbrick or for that matter a
VCR! I'd really like to see Consumers Union do a real survey on the average
time of use before a digital camera goes belly-up. I have a feeling we're
being sold a bill of goods.
OM content(not really): I tried my wife's Olympus 700uz which works fine
but is unsuited for shooting through a microscope.
Charlie Geilfuss
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|