> It is a fine lens, but if you already have a 50/1.4, I'd
> pass. There are other things to add to your Zuinventory first.
and also
>If you need any more reasons, it's also longer, fatter, 310g vs. the
>230g of the 1.4, uses 55mm filters and needs a different hood. Oh, and
>only half a stop faster than the 1.4.
and then
>You do have to be willing to live with the color cast though,
>fix it digitally, or use B&W film. It's also a bit tricky to use wide
>open since the depth of field is so small.
Good grief! Is there something funny in the water this morning? People
advising me _against_ a Zuiko purchase?
Heck, if I'm getting negative vibes _here_, then obviously it was not meant
to be..
thanks! My finances love you all..
-- dan
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|