ML Archiv: Re: [OM] Plastic lenses, was TAMRON 28-80 SP

Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] Plastic lenses, was TAMRON 28-80 SP

from Winsor Crosby

Subject:	Re: [OM] Plastic lenses, was TAMRON 28-80 SP
From:	Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sun, 2 Jun 2002 13:57:38 -0700

In particular, the 35-70/3.5-4.5 is 'highly plastic' as is the 35-70/4.
Excellent lenses though.

Tom

I always wondered why Olympus built two zooms so close in spec. Thereis really not that much difference between F4 and F3.6. But beingkind of heavy and metal the 3.6 really was the deluxe lens.

--
Winsor Crosby
Long Beach, California

?

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] TAMRON 28-80 SP, John Duggan Re: [OM] TAMRON 28-80 SP, Paul D. Farrar Re: [OM] Plastic lenses, was TAMRON 28-80 SP, Winsor Crosby Re: [OM] Plastic lenses, was TAMRON 28-80 SP, Tom Scales Re: [OM] Plastic lenses, was TAMRON 28-80 SP, Winsor Crosby <= Re: [OM] Plastic lenses, was TAMRON 28-80 SP, dreammoose Re: [OM] Plastic lenses, was TAMRON 28-80 SP, Winsor Crosby Re: [OM] TAMRON 28-80 SP, Carlos J. Santisteban Salinas Re: [OM] TAMRON 28-80 SP, John Duggan RE: [OM] TAMRON 28-80 SP, Angel Lobo

Previous by Date:	[OM] OT: ? on rechargeable batteries, GMcGrath
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] arc in images, OM-4, 85mm, John Hermanson
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] Plastic lenses, was TAMRON 28-80 SP, Tom Scales
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] Plastic lenses, was TAMRON 28-80 SP, dreammoose
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]