ML Archiv: Re: [OM] Digital Back, Again

Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] Digital Back, Again

from dreammoose

Subject:	Re: [OM] Digital Back, Again
From:	dreammoose <dreammoose@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 22 May 2002 18:41:19 -0700

But the effective shutter speed is very low - and a non-interchangeableone distance macro lens! Even the dist mites will move during theexposure.....


Moose

Tom Scales wrote:

I have a 24mm x 36mm sensor with 18 megapixels.

It's just inside my Nikon LS-4000 film scanner.



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] Digital Back, Again, Paul Farrar Re: [OM] Digital Back, Again, Paul Farrar Re: [OM] Digital Back, Again, Jim Couch RE: [OM] Digital Back, Again, Olaf Greve [OM] Digital Back, Again, Andy Gilbert Re: [OM] Digital Back, Again, Richard F. Man Re: [OM] Digital Back, Again, Jim Brokaw Re: [OM] Digital Back, Again, Tom Scales Re: [OM] Digital Back, Again, dreammoose <= Re: [OM] Digital Back, Again, Paul Wallich Re: [OM] Digital Back, Again, Winsor Crosby Re: [OM] Digital Back, Again, Jim Brokaw Re: [OM] Digital Back, Again, Tom Scales Re: [OM] Digital Back, Again, Jim Brokaw Re: [OM] Digital Back, Again, Tom Scales Re: [OM] Digital Back, Again, Larry Re: [OM] Digital Back, Again, Tom Scales Re: [OM] Digital Back, Again, Larry Re: [OM] Digital Back, Again, Johnny Johnson

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] M-1, Mark Dapoz
Next by Date:	Re: [OM]RE: [OM] WAAAY OT: poison-talk... (wasA RE: [OM] Bears, Water Shots and vacations (long, sorry), dreammoose
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] Digital Back, Again, Tom Scales
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] Digital Back, Again, Paul Wallich
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]