Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 28mm f2.0 versus 28mm f2.8

Subject: Re: [OM] 28mm f2.0 versus 28mm f2.8
From: "Tim Chakravorty" <suchismit@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 00:05:16 -0700
I don't pay much heed to the photodo test results.  They are strongly biased 
toward Canon.

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Pete Prunskunas 
  To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 2:20 PM
  Subject: [OM] 28mm f2.0 versus 28mm f2.8


  The lens tests at
  http://members.aol.com/olympusom/lenstests/default.htm
  suggest that the difference between the 28mm f2.0 and 28mm
  f2.8 are as follows: the f2.0 is sharper but has noticeable barrel
  distortion, while the f2.8 is the opposite (but is much cheaper).
  The lens tests at
  http://www.photodo.com/prod/lens/35lensesmtf.shtml#Olympus
  do not include both lenses, but the grade for the f2.0 is only a
  2.6/5.0, only average.  Considering that I use my wide angles
  mainly to photograph buildings, I think the f2.8 is the better lens
  considering the lessened barrel distortion.  Any comments?


  Pete

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz