Paul wrote:
> Everybody seems to love it. Add me. It's a very nice lens to have.
Sure do !
> I haven't done any serious testing, but it seems more flare
> resistant than all of the OM 35-70 zooms. It's smaller than a lot
> of makes' normal lenses. The f/4 is a bit slow. On the wide end,
> you really need f/2 (or better) for cases where you isolate the
> subject. It's good as a single lens, and makes a nice fit with a
I bought it - the f4 makes it a bit difficult to focus at the 28mm end.
> tele zoom. With the 65-200/4, for example, you get 28-200 (with an
> inconsequential gap) at f/4 constant aperture. Look for one with a
> hood -- they're almost impossible to find.
Anyone have a hood to spare ?
...Wayne
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|