It's interesting in playing around with the 21/3.5 the
lens is 'not' IMHO a very good lens for far away
landscapes. It is way too wide and would be a
nightmare to bracket. After shooting a few rolls with
it I have found it is pretty good for close up
landscapes though. I have some pictures of a park
nearby that the lens worked wonderfully on. I was able
to capture a whole scene rather than just a small part
of one. I'm trying to get the images scanned, but,
this being my first attempt ever it isn't working too
well with flatbed scanners.
Mark Lloyd
--- "Roger D. Key" <rdk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> You should not be so surprised; if you check an
> Olympus lens manual, or
> esif for that matter, you will see that Olympus
> lists applications for
> their telephoto or telephoto zoom lenses as
> "scenery, mountains" (75-150
> zoom) , or "landscapes" (180/f2). I think most
> landscapes look better with
> a telephoto!
>
> Roger Key
>
>
>
>
>
> > I´m surprised there isn`t that much use of
> superwides in this TOPE.
> >
> >
> > Frieder Faig
>
>
> I'm very surprised how many of the photos were taken
> using focal lengths in
> the telephoto range.
>
> Bruce
>
> Bruce Hamm
> Ottawa, Canada
> bhamm@xxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing
> List >
> < For questions,
> mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page:
> http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and more
http://games.yahoo.com/
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|