Me, too.
Gary Edwards
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Scales" <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 11:15 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] 180mm f2.8
> I completely agree with your assessment, but my small bag is the 200/5,
not
> /4. I find the difference in quality between the /4 and /5 to be
> insignificant and the size difference is quite large. The 180/2.8 and
200/5
> combo works best for me.
>
> Tom
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|