Local camera buffs here say that Pro Image 100 is positioned as a low cost
film to withstand rough conditions encountered by professionals ( as
mentioned below humid and hot environments ?). But they caution that it is
meant to be used in one session, i.e. storage of partially used rolls in the
camera supposedly leads to image degradation? I seemed to notice that it has
a tendency for some yellowish hue on faces.
I have used it a lot, but stopped when the local Kodak dealer began
promoting the Supra 100 at the same price of Php 65.00 which is about US $
1.25 per 36 print roll? Is this price cheap?
Fuji offers a competing product called Proplus also at ASA 100 for the same
price.
Regards
Titoy
----- Original Message -----
From: John A. Lind <jlind@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 1:12 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] [OT] Needed: KODAK PROFESSIONAL PRO IMAGE 100 Film
> At 00:07 4/12/02, I wrote:
> >Compare the last sections in the data sheets for the two films (shows
> >characteristic curves and discusses image structure):
>
> Also see the first paragraph on the Pro Image 100 data sheet:
> "It is intended for portrait and social applications,
> and can be stored at room temperature -even in hot,
> humid climates. Its printing characteristics are
> similar to those of KODAK GOLD Films to help simplify
> printing for photofinishers."
>
> This ought to be a very strong clue about what it is! The comparison of
> the characteristic curves and print grain indices clinches it.
>
> -- John
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|