Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 300mm cost (now)

Subject: Re: [OM] 300mm cost (now)
From: "Kierstin" <2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 23:43:55 -0000
I have looked at the photo and it looks like it says 1:5.6 (does this mean
anything?).

wow I didn't realise that it could make so much difference.  {F5.6 is
getting slow enough to mean a rather dark and hard to focus image in the
viewfinder}. why is this?

It looks like the best advice I am getting is to wait for a Zuiko lens.  I
appreciate the instruction, more than you know.

Kierstin

----- Original Message -----
From: "dreammoose" <dreammoose@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 11:03 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] 300mm cost (now)


Few, if any, of us know anything about the lens you are asking about.
Vivitar is a US marketing company, not a manufacturer. Over the years,
they have sold a vast array of lenses manufactured by various companies
and of widely varying quality. They may well have sold more than one
300mm lens in OM mount. You don't mention the speed (f3.5 or fx.x?),
which might help someone identify the lens. Vivitar has sold some famous
lenses that qualify as classics (none 300mm, I think). Several of the
early 'Series 1' lenses designed in the US and manufactured by Kiron in
Japan are famous for quality. More recent 'Series 1's have more mixed
reputations. For more info on quality lenses from Vivitar and other
third party manufacturers, check out
http://people.smu.edu/rmonagha/third/cult.html#vivitar

Vivitar has also sold a lot of inexpensive, rather ordinary lenses. I
suspect the one you are looking at falls into this category. If you are
on a budget and/or unsure about how you would like working with a
longish telephoto, and the lens has clean, unmarked glass and functions
properly, it's probably not a bad thing to try. Remember that the
photographer has more to do with the quality of the picture than the
equipment. All of this is particularly true if you will be looking at
4x6" prints. A quick look on eBay shows 2 different looking lenses,
f5.5 that looks like an older design and f5.6. Two 5.6s sold for $71 and
$80, so the price being asked sound reasonable. F5.6 is getting slow
enough to mean a rather dark and hard to focus image in the viewfinder.
You should try looking through it on your camera before buying.

On the other hand, the Zuiko 300/4.5 is a well known lens. Many of us
have them and know them to be very well made, optically excellent and
unusually light and compact for the focal length and speed.
If you can afford one, you can't go wrong. Even if you end up not liking
it, the hold value pretty well. A few have sold recently on eBay for
under $300.

Moose

Kierstin wrote:

>you didn't say if you thought that £40 was too much or if you thought that
>this lens would be any good?
>


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >




< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz