Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] TOPE: Landscapes/TOPE

Subject: Re: [OM] TOPE: Landscapes/TOPE
From: dreammoose <dreammoose@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 00:56:28 -0800
Rant on, Baby, you know you got the chops!

Moose

bhinderks@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

<snip>
In the same vein it is time for me to leave. Guess near thirty years of
taking pictures has all been a waste.
        1) I can't meet anyone's definition of a landscape
        2) My magazine photo editors and portrait clients are all idiots cause
they should know I shoot in vibrating airplanes with long lenses ( 200mm)
and routinely handhold at 1/125th and even 1/60th -- those pictures can't
be sharp. Nor can the portraits shot handheld with 100/2.8 SC and useless
75-150/4 zooms at 1/60th and routinely blown to 11 X 14 and even <gasp> 16X20
        3) the bulk of my lenses are crappy old silver nose SCs including the
useless 28/3.5 that has earned me countless dollars - I really should be
using those F2 babies.
        4)I just put on a month long photo display that over 2000 people have
complimented us on despite using crappy old Max 400 print film and a
useless one hour lab.

Obviously I am out of my league with you guys.

Barry H



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz