Pretty much my opinion. And a seascape ain't a landscape, and
neither is a cityscape. But would it be okay to include a
scapegoat in a landscape, or would that just be an escape from
reality?
My TOPE entry went in two weeks ago. I got lucky in the dead of
gray, dreary winter and actually got a reasonably decent picture.
Of course, that's just my opinion, and I could be wrong.
Walt Wayman
---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 10:03:32 -0800
>
>...the landscape is the last layer for everything. For it to be
>a landscape it has to be the subject, not the background.
>Anything in the landscape becomes a picture of the thing. A
>fence or a barn in the landscape is a picture of a fence or a
>barn unless it is so small as to be inconsequential, or just an
>accent in the picture.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|