ML Archiv: Re: [OM] Is this a Fang?

Subject:	Re: [OM] Is this a Fang?
From:	Pschings@xxxxxxx
Date:	Fri, 22 Mar 2002 16:01:13 EST

"35-70/3.6 - The first, and only full Zuiko 35-70mm..."

<snip>

No, the 35-70/4 AF for the OM-30/F (works less conveniently on all OMs 
though) was a full Zuiko (not an S Zuiko).

Paul Schings

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] Is this a Fang?, (continued) Re: [OM] Is this a Fang?, wavegirl Re: [OM] Is this a Fang?, Ed Senior Re: [OM] Is this a Fang?, Pschings Re: [OM] Is this a Fang?, ClassicVW RE: [OM] Is this a Fang?, Timpe, Jim Re: [OM] Is this a Fang?, ClassicVW RE: [OM] Is this a Fang?, Timpe, Jim RE: [OM] Is this a Fang?, Paul Kraig Re: [OM] Is this a Fang?, dreammoose Re: [OM] Is this a Fang?, ClassicVW Re: [OM] Is this a Fang?, Pschings <= Re: [OM] Is this a Fang?, dreammoose RE: [OM] Is this a Fang?, Daniel J. Mitchell Re: [OM] Is this a Fang?, dreammoose Re: [OM] Is this a Fang?, Roger D. Key

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] (OT) And we complain about OM prices......., ClassicVW
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] (OT) And we complain about OM prices......., Tom Trottier
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] Is this a Fang?, ClassicVW
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] Is this a Fang?, dreammoose
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]