> At 12:07 AM 3/13/02 -0500, Bill Owens wrote:
>
>> Would this be considered a Fang?
>>
>>
>> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1338063386&ssPageName=ADM
>> E:B:BN:US:1
>
> Hi Bill,
>
> I'll leave others to comment on the fang worthyness of the Pentax since I
> haven't been watching them but I did pick up a Hasselblad 500 C/M with a
> 150mm, f4 Sonnar and 120 back for $600. It also included both a waist
> level and smokestack finder. I don't consider that a fang but it was a
> durn good price. Only problem now is that I have the wants for something
> to scan 6x6's. :-(
>
Mmmmm Hasselblad....I'd say that's not bad!
I did once manage to get a fairly decent Rolleiflex T (Tessar 3.5) with a
disintegrating leather case from an army surplus store for £75. It's not the
best Rollei ever and it's no Hassie, it has some small nicks on the optics,
but great for the price.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|