Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Extension tubes (was Bellows?)

Subject: Re: [OM] Extension tubes (was Bellows?)
From: "C.H.Ling" <chling@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 13:14:01 +0800
I think smaller hole is not a problem unless you use the 80/4 or
135/4.5 with the tubes. Tube with smaller hole may not fit the lenses.

C.H.Ling

Dave Shupe wrote:
> 
> I have a set of Quantaray extension tubes.  They are automatic, 13mm, 21mm,
> & 31mm in length.  The biggest difference in these and my Olympus 25mm Auto
> extension tube is the diameter of the inside of the tube.  The Quantaray is
> 1.2" while the Olympus is 1.458".  There does not seem to be any problem
> with the smaller hole, but I was wondering if it would be a cause for
> concern.
> 
> Cheers!
> 
> Dave Shupe
> kc7iek@xxxxxxxxx
> 
> Latitude 47? 43' 1" North, Longitude 122? 6' 15" West
> 
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz