| Subject: | RE: [OM] Don't need no stinking OM-2 |
|---|---|
| From: | Joel Wilcox <jowilcox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 31 Jan 2002 07:08:41 -0600 |
Chris,Now I follow you. Of course, not all of us have the 40/2 with which to trinketize our OM jewelry. <gg> Joel W. At 06:23 AM 1/31/2002 +0000, Chris Barker you wrote: Retro only as far as the early 70s then ;-). You're right, I'm geting my periods mixed... perhaps on purpose. But an OM1 with a small, prime lens and hood is definitely old-fashioned and 50s looking. < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] archiving... how to make a contact proof with a scanner, Charles Sdunek |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] alcohol; retro cameras, Joel Wilcox |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [OM] Don't need no stinking OM-2, Chris Barker |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] 40/2 is a serious lens... was Don't need no stinking OM-2, Chris Barker |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |