| Subject: | RE: [OM] Re: Digital v real photography - slightly OT and long |
|---|---|
| From: | "Wayne Harridge" <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 5 Jan 2002 20:48:44 +1100 |
Winsor wrote: > I thought the Epson 2000P inks were pretty well established at 25 > plus years. Pretty well established ? Show me one in 25 years and I'll believe it. ...Wayne < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Archival photos especially family history, Brian Swale |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] 100/2.8 vs 100/2 vs 135/2.8, allan |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Digital v real photography - slightly OT and long, Winsor Crosby |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [OM] Re: Digital v real photography - slightly OT and long, Chip Stratton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |